joshua abbott
joshua.t.abbott@gmail.com  

      




me  |  research  |  papers

My research lies at the intersection of machine learning and cognitive science where I've been interested in developing computational models of higher-level cognition, including categorization, language usage, and memory search. I've explored a number of different questions and research topics to better understand these aspects of higher-level cognition, as described below.


Cognition and computer vision: Recent advances in AI/ML/CV have produced models of image classification and recognition with above-human performance -- but what does that really mean? I've been interested in exploring how these models differ from people, particularly with the way people reason differently about categories depending on context. Some relevant papers:


Color language and cognition across cultures: Questions about color language and cognition have been a central debate in cognitive science. I've been involved in a research program that explores how general computational and statistical principles can illuminate fundamental aspects of color naming across the diverse languages of the world. Some relevant papers:


Semantic memory search: Human memory has a vast capacity, storing all the semantic knowledge, facts, and experiences that people accrue over a lifetime. Given this huge repository of data, retrieving any one piece of information from memory is a challenging computational problem. I've explored how some simple statistical models like random walks and MCMC can reproduce complex human behavior in memory search tasks.


Approximations to Bayesian inference: Probabilistic models of cognition have become a leading framework for exploring questions of higher-level cognition, particularly on how people reason under uncertainty. However, the difficult computations over structured representations that are often required by these models seem incompatible with the continuous and distributed nature of human minds. I've been interested in showing how difficult Bayesian computations can be approximated by more tractable methods which also characterize human behavior.